In brief

On 30 March 2023, Members of the European Parliament endorsed proposed reforms to the General Product Safety Directive (GPSD) in the form of a Regulation, intended to safeguard consumers. This new Regulation looks set to be one of the most significant updates to the EU’s product regulatory landscape in modern history – making substantial amendments to the GPSD, which has been in force for more than two decades.

The objective of the Regulation is to improve the functioning of the internal market while providing for a high level of consumer protection to EU consumers in respect of products they purchase, both in store and online, with the European Commission (EC) also calling out in its press release (see here) the increased protection of vulnerable consumers, like children and persons with disabilities. The Regulation will also enhance market surveillance of dangerous products in the EU and ensure that any recalls of such products are effective and carried out swiftly.

As a Regulation, this legislation will be directly applicable, leaving little room for disparities across EU countries. The Regulation is relevant for any economic operator which is in any way involved in the sale of products onto the EU market; even those who are not themselves established within the EU will need to comply with the new rules.

The Regulation must now be endorsed at European Council level before it comes into force.

In depth – what we can expect from the reform

The new regulation aligns the existing GPSD with the latest developments in digitalisation, in line with the EC’s New Consumer Agenda of 2020. The Regulation looks set to make a number of changes to the existing product regulatory landscape, including:

1.    Responsible Person

The Regulation contains a requirement for a “responsible person” to be established within the EU before products can be placed on the EU market, likely with a view to ensuring that there is always an EU entity that can be held accountable for any product related issues. That responsible person will have various obligations, including for ensuring the safety of the product it is responsible for and for continuing to ensure that the product complies with appropriate technical documentation. The Regulation also requires that details of the economic operator are included on the product or on its packaging, for the ease of consumers.

2.    Online Marketplaces

The EC considers that growth of e-commerce has decreased the effectiveness of the GPSD. This is particularly relevant in circumstances where 73% of consumers bought products online in 2021 (compared to 50% in 2014). Accordingly, the Regulation recognises that providers of online marketplaces play a crucial role in the supply chain, allowing economic operators to reach a greater number of consumers, and therefore also in the product safety system. As such, the Regulation seeks to regulate this area by including specific requirements in respect of online marketplaces and online sales.

In particular, the Regulation includes various requirements for providers of online marketplaces to, for example, (i) identify and register a single contact point for market surveillance authorities; (ii) publish safety warnings when publishing online adverts; and (iii) directly notify affected consumers who bought through their interfaces a product which is subject of a product safety recall or where certain information has to be brought to the attention of consumers to ensure the safe use of a product. Online marketplaces also have obligations to inform market surveillance authorities, via the Safety Business Gateway, about dangerous products that they have made available on their online interface, and to report accidents as set out in further detail below.

3.    Accident Reporting

Whilst earlier drafts of the Regulation required reporting of an accident related to the safety of a product by an economic operator within two business days, the final version of the Regulation has rowed back from this position, instead mandating reporting of an accident via the Safety Business Gateway without undue delay from knowledge of that accident. Whilst the Regulation does not provide any definition of ‘accident’, it does outline a relatively high threshold for the severity of such accident to warrant a notification. A report would need to be made in respect of an accident that “resulted in an individual’s death or in serious adverse effects on that individual’s health and safety, permanent or temporary, including injuries, other damage to the body, illnesses and chronic health effects”.

The Regulation sets out separate accident reporting obligations for online marketplaces, with a different threshold for the making of a report. In particular, a report must be made in respect of an accident which has resulted in a “serious risk or actual damage to the health or safety of a consumer, caused by a product made available on their online marketplace and inform the manufacturer thereof”. This comparatively lower threshold for the reporting of accidents could lead to some inconsistencies in terms of which accidents are reported by economic operators vs. online marketplaces.

4.    Product Recalls 

The improvement of the effectiveness of product recalls across the EU has been a key objective for the EC in the reform of the GPSD. Accordingly, the Regulation sets out granular requirements for the conduct of product recalls, details which we would generally expect to see in guidance rather than legislation itself.

Under the Regulation, all economic operators (including manufacturers, distributors and importers) will have an obligation to act to recall dangerous products, with online marketplaces also being obliged to cooperate to ensure effective product recalls. Detailed provisions as to the contents and form of the recall notice have also been included, presumably for standardisation purposes.

5.    New Technologies

The Regulation seeks to ensure that the EU’s product safety regime can be applied effectively to 21st century developments and can respond quickly to new and emerging challenges, including those posed by connected products, software updates and downloads as well as the evolving functionalities of AI-powered products. To address this issue, the Regulation adopts newly improved definitions; for example, ‘product’, now expressly includes a reference to items which are interconnected to other items.

The Regulation also includes a list of points for consideration when assessing the safety of products, including:

  • The effect of the product on other products, including the interconnection of those products
  • The appropriate cybersecurity features necessary to protect the product against external influences, including malicious third parties, where such an influence might have an impact on the safety of the product, including the possible loss of interconnection
  • The evolving, learning and predictive functionalities of the product

The Regulation also addresses responsibility for product safety where a substantial modification is made to a product; the person performing that substantial modification will be considered a ‘manufacturer’ of that product.

6.    Penalties

Whilst previous drafts of the Regulation asserted a maximum penalty equating to at least 4% of a company’s annual turnover in the relevant Member State, the version which has been endorsed by the European Parliament states that penalties must be “effective, proportionate and dissuasive”, but leaves to the discretion of member states the decision as to what penalty would be appropriate.

What next?

The European Council will now also need to formally endorse the Regulation before it is published in the EU Official Journal and enters into force. The Regulation will apply eighteen months after such publication. Realistically therefore, the earliest we can expect the Regulation to apply is early 2025.

Following Britain’s exit from the EU, and assuming that the new Regulation is not replicated in the UK during its own review of its product safety regime before it comes into force in the EU, companies selling products on both the UK and EU markets could find themselves in the difficult position of being required to comply with two (different) sets of requirements. Every company involved in the sale of products to the EU market must now ensure they are prepared for this new era of product safety in the EU. For further information on these developments and how they may affect your business, please do not hesitate to get in touch with any member of our team.

John Leadley
Author

John Leadley is a partner in the Baker McKenzie Dispute Resolution team based in London, and former Chair of the Global Dispute Resolution team. John is recognised as a Leading Individual by Legal 500 for both Commercial Litigation and Product Liability work. Chambers & Partners also cite the quality of his work on European regulatory issues around products. He is also recognised as a leading professional in his field at government level. He and his colleague, Kate Corby, were the only law firm partners invited by the Department of Business, Innovation & Skills to be part of the steering group set up to consider reforms to its review into consumer product recall processes in the UK. He has previously taken part in similar initiatives with the Corporation of British Industry and the Association of British Healthcare Industries.

Kate Corby
Author

Kate Corby is a partner in Baker McKenzie’s Dispute Resolution team in London. Kate has substantial experience of representing clients in complex litigation and arbitration, with a focus on construction and engineering disputes. She also has significant experience in advising on product liability, safety and regulatory compliance. Kate was ranked in Chambers & Partners 2015 and 2016 as an Associate to Watch. She was also noted in Legal 500 UK 2016 for her "strategic thinking". Kate and her colleague John Leadley were the only law firm partners invited by the Department of Business, Innovation & Skills to be part of the steering group set up to consider implementation of the recommendations from its review into consumer product recall processes commissioned in 2015.