In brief

On December 22, 2025, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) added all foreign produced uncrewed aircraft systems (UAS or drones) and critical drone components to the FCC Covered List (“Covered List“), a designation that prohibits them from gaining FCC authorization on the ground that they pose an unacceptable risk to US national security or the security and safety of US persons. That rule could have effectively prohibited the sale in the US of foreign-manufactured drones or critical drone parts.

On January 7, 2026, however, the FCC modified the ban by exempting foreign UAS and critical UAS components that are already on the “Blue List” maintained by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), as well as components considered “domestic end products” under the Buy American Standard.

Please contact us for more information about the UAS ban and its exemptions.

Key takeaways

  • Companies that sell UAS in the United States must promptly evaluate their supply chains to ensure that all products destined for the US market are either (a) fully domestically produced or (b) fall within one of the two exemptions to the Covered List
  • The exemptions, created through a National Security Determination from the Department of War, underscore the administration’s efforts to promote domestic manufacturing and guard against the risk US adversaries can exploit technology sold in the US by introducing vulnerabilities.
  • Regular communication with counsel is important to ensure compliance, identify and mitigate supply chain risks, and prevent potential enforcement actions.

In more detail

Drones have emerged as a major US national security concern. In a recent Executive Order, the President recognized that drones can be designed with backdoors and vulnerabilities that allow US adversaries to divert them to engage in covert activities. Also, the extensive deployment of drones in the Ukraine war highlights their varied kinetic military applications.

Last year, the White House convened an interagency body to review national security risks posed by foreign UAS products. On December 21, 2025, this body released a National Security Determination (“December Determination“) stating that foreign UAS products pose an unacceptable national security risk to the United States and called on the FCC to add such products to its Covered List. The FCC responded by issuing its new policy on December 22, 2025.

Inclusion on the Covered List prevents a product from receiving FCC equipment authorization, 47 C.F.R. § 2.903(a), which is a requirement for radio frequency devices to be marketed in or imported to the US, 47 C.F.R. § 2.803(b). Thus, the December Determination had the practical effect of preventing any new foreign UAS products from gaining approval to enter the US market. This sweeping ban was particularly significant because a large proportion of US commercial drones are manufactured overseas in whole or in part.

The December Determination stated that both the DoW and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) may issue supplementary National Security Determinations exempting UAS products. Shortly thereafter, on January 7, 2026, the DoW invoked this authority to issue a supplemental Declaration (“January Declaration“) creating two categories of exemptions to the ban.

The first category exempts UAS and critical components on the DCMA’s Blue UAS Cleared List of drones approved for use by DoW. Critical Components include “data transmission devices, communications systems, flight controllers, ground control stations and UAS controllers, navigation systems, sensors and cameras, batteries and battery management systems, and motors.”The second category exempts UAS and critical components that qualify as “domestic end products” under the Buy American Standard, which deems a product as domestic if the cost of its US-made components exceeds 60% of the total cost of all components. Both exemptions are set to expire on January 1, 2027. The FCC also released guidance for requesting a case-specific “Conditional Approval” for covered products that will be forwarded to DoW and DHS for review.

This development has implications beyond the drone ban:

  • First, this marks the first time the Covered List has been used to ban an entire category of foreign-produced products, rather than targeting specific products from specific companies.
  • Second, the White House’s creation of a body to review and restrict an entire category of products may be applied to other industries.
  • Third, it signals that the US Government is expansively using regulatory tools to pursue its policy goals of expanding US manufacturing and mitigating foreign influence.

Companies that market products with capabilities that may implicate US national security concerns should stay informed about emerging regulatory developments. Baker McKenzie is uniquely positioned to assist clients in navigating this shifting environment by tracking potential policy changes, assessing and validating critical supply‑chain dependencies for compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and implementing proactive strategies to minimize the risk and impact of enforcement actions.1


1 Ethan Primeaux assisted in drafting this alert.

Author

Biography Rod Rosenstein is a member of the North America Litigation & Government Enforcement Practice Group and the Global Dispute Resolution Practice Group, based in Baker McKenzie's Washington, DC office. He is co-chair of the firm's National Security Practice, a team of former US government officials, former prosecutors, trade practitioners, and data privacy and cyber lawyers. During the administrations of Presidents George W. Bush, Barack Obama and Donald Trump, Rod held senior political appointments as the Deputy Attorney General of the United States, US Attorney for the District of Maryland, and Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for tax enforcement in the US Department of Justice. He previously served as an Assistant US Attorney and a Criminal Division trial attorney and represented the US government in 23 jury trials while arguing 21 civil and criminal cases in appellate courts and the US Supreme Court. He also served as a law clerk to Judge Douglas Ginsburg of the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. As the second-highest ranking Department of Justice official, Rod managed a USD 28 billion budget and oversaw 115,000 employees in the Department’s litigating divisions, law enforcement agencies and US Attorney’s Offices. He developed policies concerning corporate criminal prosecutions and parallel domestic and foreign investigations, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act matters, and health care fraud cases. He also approved significant proposed criminal and civil enforcement actions, False Claims Act settlements, and corporate monitor appointments. Rod led the Cyber-Digital Task Force and the Task Force on Market Integrity and Consumer Fraud, and reviewed national security issues as a member of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). Practice Focus Rod is a highly skilled trial and appellate lawyer with more than three decades of experience in resolving complex civil and criminal matters and representing companies and universities in federal and state enforcement investigations and congressional investigations. He advises clients facing sensitive regulatory, enforcement, and litigation challenges, including government investigations, crisis management, national security and cybersecurity issues, tax controversies, internal investigations, compliance, and monitoring. Representative Legal Matters Rod’s recent matters include: Representing a university in a congressional investigation. Representing a company in a federal investigation of potential criminal antitrust violations. Representing a company in a federal investigation of potential criminal tax violations. Representing a company in a federal investigation of potential criminal violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Representing a company in a federal investigation of potential criminal violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act. Representing a defendant charged with conspiring to evade US sanctions. Representing an individual in a federal investigation of potential criminal money laundering violations. Representing a defendant in a federal False Claims Act lawsuit. Representing a company in a state civil lawsuit filed by a state attorney general alleging environmental violations. Representing a company in a federal civil lawsuit involving alleged antitrust violations. Representing a corporate executive in a federal investigation of potential criminal tax violations. Representing a law firm in a federal lawsuit relating to potential criminal tax violations. Representing a company in a private civil lawsuit concerning alleged state healthcare and antitrust violations. Representing a trade association in a federal civil lawsuit by a state attorney general involving alleged antitrust violations. Representing a company in an enforcement action filed by a state attorney general involving alleged licensing violations. Representing a company in a federal tax audit. Representing a company in a federal civil lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act. Professional Honors Chambers – Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigations Benchmark Litigation – Washington, DC, White Collar Crime Chief’s Award, Metropolitan Police Department, 2021 Public Servant Award, Armenian Bar Association, 2019 Kentucky Colonel Appointment, Governor of Kentucky, 2018 Distinguished Service Award, Maryland State’s Attorneys’ Association, 2017 Courage in Government Award, Greater Baltimore Committee, 2017 Governor’s Citation, State of Maryland, 2017 J. Joseph Curran Public Service Award, Maryland Bar Foundation, 2017 President’s Award, Mid Atlantic Regional Gang Enforcement Network, 2017 Peter A. DiRito Award, Federal Bar Association, 2012 Fraud Fighter of the Year, Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, 2009 Leadership in Law Award, Maryland Daily Record, 2007 Traphagen Distinguished Alumnus, Harvard Law School, 2006 Chief’s Award, Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation Division, 2005 Wasserstein Public Interest Fellow, Harvard Law School, 1997 Professional Associations and Memberships American Bar Association American Law Institute American Bar Foundation American College of Tax Counsel Federal Bar Association Maryland State Bar Association National Association of Former US Attorneys Legal Services Corporation Edward Bennett Williams Inn of Court Lawyers’ Round Table Law Club of Baltimore Serjeants’ Inn Law Club of Baltimore Harvard Law School Alumni Association Wharton Club of DC Admissions U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit (2004) U.S. Supreme Court (2002) U.S. Tax Court (2002) Maryland~United States (2002) U.S. District Court, District of Maryland~United States (2000) U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit (1998) U.S. District Court, District of Columbia~United States (1995) District of Columbia~United States (1992) U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit (1991) U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit (1990) Pennsylvania~United States (1989) Education Harvard Law School (JD, cum laude) (1989) University of Pennsylvania Wharton School (BS, summa cum laude) (1986) Languages English Publications & Presentations Co-author, “Proposed Changes to FARA will Result in More Questions than Answers,” JD Supra, Jan. 7, 2025 Author, “Tax Leadership Vacuum in Justice Department Must Come to an End,” Bloomberg Law, August 2024 Co-author, “D.C. Circuit Rules Out Injunctive Relief for Past FARA Violations, Leaving Criminal Prosecution as the Only Remedy,” JD Supra, June 21, 2024 Author, “A Closer Look at the Federal Criminal Enforcement Slump,” Law 360, January 2024 Co-author, “Justice Manual Updates Bring Needed Clarity On Policy Shifts,” Law 360, April 2023

Author

Biography Katrina Jackson is an associate in Baker McKenzie's Litigation & Government Enforcement Practice Group, based in the Firm’s Washington DC office. Prior to joining the Firm, Katrina worked at an American multinational corporate law firm, where she advised healthcare entities, universities, and a range of corporate clients—including those in financial services and technology—facing investigations by regulatory and enforcement bodies such as the DOJ, Congress, and State Attorneys General. Practice Focus Katrina advises clients navigating regulatory, enforcement, and litigation challenges, with a focus on cross-border investigations, national security and cybersecurity matters, tax controversies, internal investigations, and corporate compliance and monitoring. Clerkship Judge Robert A. Salerno, Superior Court of the District of Columbia Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, United States District Court for the District of New Jersey Admissions District of Columbia~United States (2022) Education George Washington University Law School (JD) (2021) George Washington University (BA) (2017) Languages English

Author

Biography Sumon Dantiki is co-chair of the Firm’s National Security Practice and a member of the Litigation and Government Enforcement Practice Group, based in the Firm's Washington, DC office. Sumon is widely recognized as a leading professional on issues involving security, technology and law. Sumon held several senior positions with the US Department of Justice (DOJ), including serving as Senior Counselor to the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). In this role, Sumon advised FBI leadership on the most sophisticated criminal, investigative and intelligence issues facing the US. This included assisting the FBI Director in his oversight of a broad range of intelligence and criminal investigations and responses as well as working with the National Security Council and other intelligence, law enforcement, and security agencies in responding to data breaches, insider threats, economic espionage, foreign investment risks, ransomware attacks, and other major security threats. He also served with the DOJ as Special Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General for National Security and as a federal prosecutor in the Criminal Division’s Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section. Sumon previously served as adjunct professor at Georgetown University Law Center teaching a course about Cyber and National Security Threats and as a judicial clerk to the Honorable Kenneth M. Karas in the Southern District of New York and the Honorable José A. Cabranes on the Second Circuit US Court of Appeals. Practice Focus Sumon has led a variety of pathbreaking cyber, national security, and investigative matters in the private sector. He is a trusted strategist for sensitive, multi-dimensional investigations, disputes and transactional counseling, especially matters with cybersecurity, national security, and cross-border aspects. Sumon routinely advises multinational clients on preventing and resolving critical risks to their business interests, including data breaches, insider threats, transactional and compliance risks, ransomware attacks, whistleblower complaints, and complex fraud. Representative Legal Matters Prior to joining Baker McKenzie, Sumon handled the following matters: Served as lead outside counsel for an American multinational technology company in its pathbreaking investigation of, and litigation against, Russian cybercriminal botnet activity. Routinely served as outside counsel for cybersecurity reviews by internal audit function of major technology companies. Advised multiple significant investors on cyber and national security risks arising from US-China investments. Advised a private equity fund on data security matters in relation to the acquisition of a majority interest in solar energy company. Counseled a leading global company on response to cybersecurity incident arising from MOVEit security vulnerability. Conducted investigation of cyber intrusion by advanced persistent threat actor (APT) into the networks of a company in multiple critical infrastructure sectors. Counseled a Fortune 100 energy company on investigation and remediation of cybersecurity incident relating to government contract. Advised a major technology company on responses to insider threats involving “crown jewel” data. Advised a major chemical manufacturer on data security matters in connection with the divestiture of business. Co-led an independent investigation on behalf of the Board of Directors of Fortune 300 company into allegations of social media misuse by a C-suite company executive. Led a due diligence risk assessment of potential acquisition company providing cybersecurity solutions to critical infrastructure entities. Lead an internal investigation on behalf of Fortune 300 global company regarding insider threat risks and alleged whistleblower claims centered around senior executive with sensitive responsibilities. Represented an innovative energy company in trade secret theft investigation by departing senior executive. Led an internal investigation on behalf of hospitality company related to data theft by a terminated executive, as well as managing subsequent law enforcement engagement. Admissions District of Columbia~United States (2010) U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit~United States Education Yale Law School (JD) (2009) University of Michigan (BA) (2004)